Today in The Ripple Effect, we are discussing President Trump’s recent executive order that blocks state-level climate change policies. It’s a sweeping move with real consequences—some immediate, others unfolding long after the headlines fade. The order strips states of their power to enforce independent environmental laws, consolidating that authority back at the federal level. The Trump administration says this is about “restoring American energy dominance.” But under the surface, this looks less like a path to progress and more like a political stunt wrapped in red, white, and black coal dust

In early April 2025, President Trump signed an executive order that blocks state-level climate change policies in one fell swoop. It’s the kind of sweeping, top-down move that doesn’t just shift policy—it shakes the foundation of how power is supposed to be distributed in this country. The order strips states of their right to enforce independent environmental laws and reassigns that authority to the federal government. The administration is calling it a push for “American energy dominance.” That branding sounds bold, even patriotic, but once you peel it back, the play becomes clear: this ain’t about power in the electrical sense—it’s about political power.

And at the heart of this push is coal.

Trump has had a long-standing love affair with the coal industry. For him, coal isn’t just a power source—it’s a symbol. He’s romanticized it on the campaign trail, used it to rally support, and wrapped it in slogans like “energy independence” and “job creation.” His base eats that up, especially in regions hit hard by the collapse of coal. There’s emotional capital tied to the industry—nostalgia, pride, and the promise of restored livelihoods. So when he invokes coal, it’s less about BTUs and more about blue-collar ballots.

The narrative is easy to sell: bring back American jobs, cut foreign dependence, and rebuild forgotten communities. If you’re living in a town that once thrived on coal, this executive order can feel like someone finally remembered you. Coal is domestic. It doesn’t require diplomacy or deals. It’s a resource we already have, buried in our own soil, and pulling it up puts people to work. That’s the pitch.  But here’s the real: coal comes with a heavy price tag—one we’ve been trying to stop paying for decades.

Coal is one of the dirtiest energy sources on the planet. It releases a cocktail of harmful substances—CO₂, sulfur dioxide, mercury, and fine particulate matter. These aren’t just emissions on a chart. They’re toxins that trigger asthma in kids, heart problems in the elderly, and long-term health issues for entire communities. Trump may talk about “clean coal,” but that phrase is marketing fluff, not science. Even the most modern coal plants can’t clean up the inherent damage baked into the process.  And let’s not forget the economics. Coal’s glory days are over—not because of regulation, but because of the market. Renewable energy has matured. Solar and wind are no longer fringe experiments—they’re thriving industries that often beat coal on price per kilowatt hour. Add to that the flexibility, scalability, and low maintenance costs of renewables, and suddenly coal looks less like a comeback story and more like a stubborn refusal to evolve.  Nuclear energy, controversial as it is, still offers a carbon-neutral base load option. And hydroelectric? That’s another solid alternative, where geography allows. No energy solution is perfect, but when weighed against coal’s environmental and economic baggage, these options look like common sense. The grid doesn’t need nostalgia—it needs efficiency, sustainability, and forward-thinking investment.

So then, why the push for coal? Why burn political capital on a resource that’s being phased out around the world?

Simple: it’s not about energy. It’s about identity. Coal is a cultural touchstone for Trump’s political strategy. It taps into the heartland, the Rust Belt, the places where decline was blamed on liberal elites and globalism. This executive order isn’t about lights staying on—it’s about headlines, sound bites, and winning key states with three-word slogans and black smudges on hard hats.

But there’s something deeper and more dangerous happening here: the erosion of state autonomy.

This move doesn’t just undercut environmental goals—it sets a precedent that the federal government can nullify state action on climate, public health, or any issue it sees fit. That’s a slippery slope. States have long served as testing grounds for innovative policy. Some succeed, some fail, but the experimentation is part of the balance. Taking that away flattens the conversation and centralizes power in a way that benefits very few, very temporarily.

And if you’re a parent, this isn’t abstract. It’s your kids’ future on the chopping block. Because the effects of climate inaction aren’t twenty or thirty years away anymore. We’re already seeing it—wildfires, floods, droughts, superstorms. These aren’t coincidences. They’re warnings. And ignoring them to score political points today means passing the fallout to the next generation with no safety net.

Let’s not pretend this is about jobs, either. If we really cared about the working class, we’d be investing in transition programs—getting coal workers trained and placed in renewable energy jobs that are growing fast and paying well. We’d be rebuilding infrastructure with climate resilience in mind, strengthening the grid, and securing supply chains for the next wave of clean tech. That’s the version of energy independence that actually builds a future.

But instead, we’re doubling down on outdated systems, passing off short-term wins as long-term strategy. This is a rerun—one where the ending doesn’t change no matter how many times you rewatch it. The coal industry doesn’t just struggle because of regulation. It struggles because it’s being outperformed. And clinging to it only delays the inevitable while deepening the damage.

So here we are, once again, playing tug-of-war with the future.  We’re choosing nostalgia over innovation. Politics over science. Power over principle.  And if we’re not careful, we’ll wake up in a world where the decisions we made to “protect American jobs” actually endangered American lives—and the planet that sustains them.

This isn’t just environmental policy. It’s generational accountability.  Because while Trump might sign the order, it’s our children who’ll pay the price.  Or, to borrow the words of environmentalist Wendell Berry:  The Earth is what we all have in common. And what we do to it, we do to ourselves.” — Wendell Berry

One story. One truth. One ripple at a time. This is The Ripple Effect, powered by The Truth Project.